Check 30 papers over lunch, not over the weekend
Upload your students’ papers. Plag groups the versions, hides the matches that do not matter, shows which papers are worth opening and reviews each paper from every angle: matches, translations, AI signal, citations, language errors and reviewer notes. You write the feedback to the student with one click.
Less time per paper
Instead of six reports and feedback written from scratch. Nothing slips through: the same checks for every paper.
From upload to feedback for the student
You upload
Word and other common formats. You can upload many papers at once.
Plag groups
Versions by the same student on one row; author, supervisor, group and level read from the title page.
You see what to open
“Good” and “Review”. What does not matter stays hidden.
You review from every angle
Six checks with colours in the text and one shared view.
You give feedback
Suggested feedback, a link for the student and a comparison of the corrected version.
And the whole paper from every angle, in one place
No need to open several tools. Each check has its own colour in the text, so you see at once what is marked and where.
The examples use made-up data.
Low risk is hidden, high risk stays.
Sentences from other languages: the same claim or only the same topic.
A prompt for a conversation, not proof.
Citation and reference list errors.
Essential remarks on the content; minor ones hidden.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and style with a suggested fix.
You see only what changed.
See the source and whether it is the same claim, not just a percentage
Translated sentences are compared with the source: AI says whether it is the same claim or only the same topic. If both rely on the same cited author, that is noted too.
- Low-risk matches are hidden, not deleted
- Source card with the sentences in both languages
Magretta (2002, p. 91) points out that some people use the terms “strategy” and “business model” interchangeably. The author of the paper shares this view.
minerva.usc.es · Open source ↗
Citation errors grouped, not scattered across the paper
You see which errors exist and how often they repeat, and one click takes you to the place in the text. No more checking every reference by hand.
- Missing years, pages or source in the reference list
- Does not follow the format or style
Essential remarks on the content, not ten trifles
The AI reviewer reads the whole paper and names the main weaknesses and strengths. Minor remarks are hidden but one click away.
- Every remark points to the place in the paper
- You can dismiss remarks that do not matter to you
Language errors with a suggested fix
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and style errors are sorted into tabs. You see what is wrong and how to fix it, and you no longer correct every line by hand.
- You can switch error types on and off
- The feedback only states the total number
We suggest the feedback, you correct it and send it with one click
The text is written from what you keep: essential remarks, citation errors and only the matches you leave in. The student gets a link, and when they upload the corrected version you see only the changes.
- The student does not need to log in
- You see what the feedback is based on
Dismiss what does not matter. The numbers recalculate.
You can dismiss (✕) or restore (✓) each finding. The percentages at the top show what is left after your selection, and next to them you see the system’s number. Only what you keep goes into the feedback and the link.
Privacy is our highest priority
A work tool should not come out of your own pocket
Educators should not have to choose between their own money and checking.
Use your university or school email: we will verify your account faster.
Start with a single paper
You will see the whole picture in a few minutes. Free for educators, no card.
Create a free account
